DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES ENCOUNTER IN EMPLOYER ATTRACTIVENESS

Authors

  • Asanka Waruni Thiranagama Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Srilanka
  • Mathara Arachchilage Sachini Dileesha Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Srilanka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32770/jbfem.vol31-12

Keywords:

age, gender, employment status, employer attractiveness

Abstract

The apparel industry is one of the largest export earning industries in Sri Lanka and provides ample job opportunities for society. Despite that industry is facing a large labour deficiency which can lead to a shift in the industry in near future. It stresses that there is a less attraction of potential employees towards the industry. Employer attractiveness is the envisioned benefits that a potential employee sees in working for a specific organization consist with five dimensions, namely interest value, social value, economic value, application value and development value. The dissimilarity of potential employees can be caused to prevailed differences in employer attractiveness. Therefore this study aims to investigate what demographic differences are exist in the employer attractiveness in terms of gender (Male & Female), age (Young & Middle-aged) and previous experiences in employment (Experienced & In-experienced) of potential employees in the apparel industry. Findings revealed that the perceived level of the employer attractiveness varies according to the gender, age and previous experiences in employment. The highest attracting dimension of males was economic value while the least was application value. Females were more attracted to social value and less attractive to development and interest value. Both young and middle-age people tend to attract more towards the economic value while the young category is least attracted to development value and middle age category is to application value. Experienced employees are highly attracted to the economic value of the employer while least attractive to the application value. Inexperienced people tend to attract more towards social value and least to development value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alnıaçık, E., & Alnıaçık, Ü. (2012). Identifying dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding: effects of age, gender, and current employment status. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1336-1343.

Arachchige, B. J., & Robertson, A. (2013). Employer attractiveness: Comparative perceptions of undergraduate and postgraduate students. Sri Lankan Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(1), 33-48.

Backhouse, K.B., & Tikko, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501-516.

Bellou, V., Stylos, N., & Rahimi, R. (2018). Predicting hotel attractiveness via personality traits of applicants. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(10), 3135-3155.

Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International journal of advertising, 24(2), 151-172.

Biswas, M. & Suar, D. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of employer branding. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 57-72.

Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., LePine, M. A., & Moynihan, L. M. (2003). Individual job‐choice decisions and the impact of job attributes and recruitment practices: A longitudinal field study. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 42(1), 23-37.

Central Bank Report (2018). Issued by Central Bank of Sri Lanka

Ewing, M. T., Pitt, L. F., De Bussy, N. M., & Berthon, P. (2002). Employment branding in the knowledge economy. International Journal of advertising, 21(1), 3-22.

Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986-1001.

Jiang, T., & Iles, P. (2011). Employer-brand equity, organizational attractiveness and talent management in the Zhejiang private sector, China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 97-110.

Lievens, F., Decaesteker, C., Coetsier, P., & Geirnaert, J. (2001). Organizational attractiveness for prospective applicants: A person–organisation fit perspective. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 30-51.

Myrden, S. E., & Kelloway, K. (2015). Young workers’ perception of brand image: main and moderating effects. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(3), 267-281.

Newburry, W., Gardberg, N. A., & Belkin, L. Y. (2006). Organizational attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder: The interaction of demographic characteristics with foreignness. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 666-686.

Ng, E., Gossett, C., Chinyoka, S. and Obasi, I. (2016). Public vs private sector employment: An exploratory study of career choice among graduate management students in Botswana. Personnel Review, 45(6), 1367-1385.

Opatha H. H.,(2015) Introduction to HRM.

Van Hoye, G., &Lievens, F. (2007). Social influences on organizational attractiveness: Investigating if and when word-of-mouth matters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(9), 2024-2047.

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Thiranagama, A. W., & Dileesha, M. A. S. (2020). DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES ENCOUNTER IN EMPLOYER ATTRACTIVENESS. JBFEM, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32770/jbfem.vol31-12