PROPERTY SALES TAX AND BUYING INTEREST IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Vierly Ananta Upa Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Frandy E.F. Karundeng Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32770/rbaos.vol1159-166

Keywords:

property; buying; tax

Abstract

The Surabaya city government still applies the old rules, which do not implement a reduction in property sales tax rates. Data from the Office of Revenue and Financial Management (DPPK) The Surabaya city government noted, in 2015 the revenue from property sales tax reached Rp 825 billion. This is the reason behind the Surabaya city government's refusal to reduce property sales tax rates. Based on this, we want to examine whether the policies taken by the Surabaya government to not reduce property sales tax rates can affect the interest of the purchasing power of the people of Surabaya. The population in this study were all people residing in the city of Surabaya. The data collection technique carried out by the researcher was a purposive sampling technique. In this study, researchers used questionnaires as data collection techniques. The results showed that the decision of the Surabaya city government to reject the decline in property sales tax rates did not affect the people's buying interest in property in Surabaya

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Research Procedure: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dispendukcapil. (2016). Surabaya City Population Statistics. Retrieved January, 5, 2019 from Dispendukcapil database on the World Wide Web: http://dispendukcapil.surabaya.go.id/stat_new/index.php

Dong, Yue. (2018). The impact of double tax treaties on inward FDI in ASEAN countries. Journal of Business and Finance in Emerging Markets, 1(2), 128-152.

Jati, Y. (2016). WP Not paying taxes, Surabaya will lose 29.5 billion. Retrieved January 25, 2019 from Okezone sites on the World Wide Web: http://finansial.bisnis.com/ read/20160302/10/524525/wp-pribadi-tak-bayar-pajak-surabaya-terancam-kehilangan-rp295-m

Lewis, B. D. (2003). Property tax in Indonesia: measuring and explaining administrative (under‐) performance. Public Administration and Development, 23(3), 227-239.

Perda. (2010). Land and building tax. Perda Surabaya.

Rizky, M. F. (2014). Effect of Promotion and price on buying interest in Obama housing. Retrieved January 27, 2019 from Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara sites on the World Wide Web: http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/mbisnis/ article/ download/ 182/pdf_37.

Suandy, E. (2006). Taxation. Second Edition. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sudarma, I Made, and I Nyoman Darmayasa. (2018). The philosophy of Tat Twam Asi: The foundation of consciousness regarding post-tax amnesty (Cases in Indonesia). Journal of Business and Finance in Emerging Markets, 1(2), 153-160.

Sugiyono. (2012). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Published

2019-11-23

How to Cite

Upa, V. A., & Karundeng, F. E. (2019). PROPERTY SALES TAX AND BUYING INTEREST IN INDONESIA. Review of Behavioral Aspect in Organizations and Society, 1(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.32770/rbaos.vol1159-166